Thesis defense in the direction of training teachers of the Russian language and literature
- Details
- Published: 08 June 2020
Graduation work is a mandatory student certification test, an indicator of knowledge, which was mastered by a graduate of a higher education program for all years of study.
From June 1 to June 3, 2020, graduate students of the specialties "5B011800 - Russian Language and Literature", "5B012200-Russian Language and Literature in schools with non-Russian Language of Instruction" passed the defense of graduate works.
Graduates of full-time, full-time shortened, full-time distance, distance learning presented their scientific research to members of the state certification commission, demonstrated the ability to develop in the scientific field and solve the problems under study.
The state certification commission was attended by: Chairman - PhD in Philology, Doctor PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Journalism and Communication Management Mashkova S.; members of the commission: candidate of philological sciences, associate professor of the department of philology Pchelkina T., candidate of philological sciences, associate professor of the department of philology Segizbaeva K., master of pedagogical sciences, senior teacher of the department of philology Konvisarova L., senior teacher of the department of philology Arsaeva S.; secretary - Master of Humanitarian Sciences, teacher of the Department of Philology Ryadinskaya A.
The thesis defense procedure was held online for the first time. A package of necessary documents was prepared in advance, which included a report on the passage of anti-plagiarism, the text of the thesis, a review of the supervisor, a review, as well as a presentation and report of the speech. Within 15 minutes, students submitted graduate studies, and after the presentation answered questions from members of the state certification committee. Then, secretaries of the state certification commission submitted reviews and reviews of theses. Answers to the questions of the commission and the comments of reviewers became an opportunity to more fully disclose the study.
When they are discussing the results, the commission members took into account such important aspects as the content of the work, the depth and quality of the study, the degree of independence, the level of professional knowledge, the quality of design and the level of protection.
After the meeting of the commission members, the students were voiced assessments.
Graduates expressed gratitude to the supervisors for their support and advice and to the members of the commission for the work done and valuable comments.
